Combination Therapy Can Improve Outcome For Advanced Liver Cancer

Liver cancer research is in the spotlight this month. As Liver Cancer Awareness month goes on, we’re seeing more and more articles about liver cancer symptoms and treatments, liver cancer resources, and new updates in the research being done.

This article was recently released, summarizing a journal article titled “Sorafenib with Transarterial CHemoembolization Achieves Improved Survival vs. Sorafenib Alone in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.”

If you or a loved one has been recently diagnosed with liver cancer, our liver cancer resource library can offer you a number of helpful resources to help you better understand your treatment strategy, where to start, and which questions to ask your oncologist. You can also speak to your doctor or a specialist who s treating you to see what options are available for you. It is advisable as well to check with your health insurance to see what they can offer you in terms of cover. If you do not have a good plan then you may want to check out either catholic health insurance or health care providers who might help to provide support in these difficult times.

Study confirms effectiveness of a combination therapy for advanced liver cancer


Liver cancer affects hundreds of thousands of people annually, and there are few viable therapies for the advanced stages of its most common form–hepatocellular carcinoma. A drug called sorafenib improves overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and is considered a standard treatment, but questions remain regarding how we can increase its effectiveness. Right now, the two available clinical trials show that sorafenib treatment increased overall survival by 6.5 to 10.7 months.

During the past decade, scientists began to test whether a radiological procedure called transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can raise patient survival even further. This therapy involves blocking blood vessels leading to a tumor, depriving it of blood and thereby killing the malignant cells. When performed alone, TACE could stop tumors from spreading. However, only a few experiments have directly tested how addition of TACE to a sorafenib drug treatment would fare in improving survival compared with sorafenib alone. These experiments do not agree, with the only major clinical trial finding no increase in patient survival after combining TACE with sorafenib. However, adding sorafenib after TACE seems to increase indicators of therapeutic effectiveness.

To untangle these different outcomes, scientists from Taiwan and Japan, led by Dr Victor Kok from Kuang Tien General Hospital Cancer Center and Asia University Taiwan, performed the first large, national-level, population-based cohort study (published in the journal Cancers) examining the influence of TACE on the effectiveness of sorafenib against liver cancer. A cohort study involves following a group of people that share a characteristic (in this case, liver cancer) over a set period and periodically measuring relevant data from them (e.g., response to treatment). The scientists also used a statistical method called propensity matching to eliminate confounding factors (e.g., patient age, sex, socioeconomic status) that could affect between-group differences in survival beyond the effects of sorafenib and TACE. They obtained data on liver-cancer patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, which is very representative of Taiwan’s population (99.9% of the island’s population is enrolled in national health insurance).

Dr Victor Kok comments:

“Real-world data for this treatment combination is long overdue, and here we aimed to provide empirical evidence on whether sorafenib+TACE is actually more effective than sorafenib alone. Our work can fuel further research aimed at understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying any synergistic effects of sorafenib and TACE.”

After tracking the data of 2112 Taiwanese patients until their death or the end of the study, Dr Kok and colleagues identified a 26% decrease in mortality when TACE was added to sorafenib treatment, compared with sorafenib treatment alone. More specifically, six months and one year after treatment, median overall survival was 80.3% and 53.5%, respectively, in the patients treated with sorafenib+TACE, whereas it was 54.4% and 32.4% in patients treated with sorafenib alone. The improvement was present regardless of whether patients received only one session of TACE or more. Additionally, median overall survival among the sorafenib-only patients was similar to what other researchers found in the only other clinical trial that had a comparable population, suggesting that sorafenib’s anti-cancer effects are consistent. What’s more encouraging–patients appeared to tolerate the combination treatment, because negative side-effects were similar between patients treated with sorafenib alone or with sorafenib+TACE.

This real-world study provided important confirmation that sorafenib interacts with TACE to control the spread of malignant liver tumors. Dr Kok explains:

Right now, oncologists aren’t necessarily offering TACE as a treatment option because the evidence for its effectiveness isn’t fully developed. But here, we’ve used a very large dataset to show that TACE can be added to a sorafenib-based treatment and improve its outcome. We’re hoping that this will signal an advancement in liver cancer therapy, while also encouraging more research on the molecular mechanisms of exactly how sorafenib synergizes with TACE to control liver tumors. A better understanding of the underlying processes responsible for this additive, positive effect could help us identify further treatments.”

Read more.

If you or a loved one has been recently diagnosed with liver cancer, our liver cancer resource library can offer you a number of helpful resources to help you better understand your treatment strategy, where to start, and which questions to ask your oncologist.